The Pyramid - The Truth by Jeremy Potter.pdf

(809 KB) Pobierz
THE PYRAMID
THE TRUTH
BY JEREMY POTTER
2
LIST OF SECTIONS
1 The Pyramid Survey of 1965
2 The Original Great Pyramid
3 Two Corridors and a Floor
4 The South Shaft, King’s Chamber
5 The North Shaft, King’s Chamber
6 The South Shaft, Queen’s Chamber
7 The North Shaft, Queen’s Chamber
8 The Missing Queen’s Chamber floor
9 Sunrise for Re, Sunset for Set
10 The Missing Pyramid Centreline
11 The Merging of the Chambers
12 The Pyramid and the Five Voids
13 Historical Interpretations
14 The Hidden Numbers of Identity
15 Pyramids from Ancient Circles
3
INTRODUCTION
The original Great Pyramid no longer exists. It disappeared some nine hundred years ago
and the structure that can be seen today is but the remnant. The pyramid is missing its
outlines and minus its integrity. Because original pyramid had once existed it can only be
imagined if the truth is ever now to be found. Something important had been there and it
would take me over ten years to discover the incredible truth of what had been there. I
would very soon be making hundreds of calculations and using my skills as an architectural
building surveyor to find out what had been there. I would find this because I knew about
lines and angles but in the meantime I would ask a question. Why was the Great Pyramid
called great? It was a simple enough question and I did not know where the answer would
lead me, but the further I looked, the more profound it became. The pyramid was unique.
The accepted view is that the Great Pyramid was built as a tomb for the pharaoh Knufu, but
nothing at all was found inside the pyramid when it was first entered. There was no body
of a pharaoh, no tomb furniture, and nothing anywhere except bare walls, free of any
artwork or inscriptions. The idea was based only on supposition. The proof was not given
but the theory persisted and that is how it continues to be published in books.
It was
probably misplaced. I then began to think that the original pyramid might have had some
other purpose, but that was not in compliance with the official philosophy emanating from
museums and institutions who have always insisted that it built was a tomb. There were
no clear alternatives but why were they also insisting that the pyramid had not been
planned? It was an archaeologist’s viewpoint but mathematicians had been there as well.
Perhaps it was time to see if anything geometrical existed for consideration instead?
The upper chamber had been very carefully made into an exact double square and that
was a geometrical figure. Another researcher had claimed that the original pyramid was
never a pyramid at all but a truncated pyramid, or one that was missing its tip. The Great
Pyramid has a flat summit. But why would they build a pyramid without a tip? The reason
was that another much smaller pyramid had once been placed at the pinnacle and that was
another geometrical figure, as was the truncated pyramid below.
I did not believe that the tomb theory was the reason for the pyramid’s existence and it
had to have another reason for being there.
I was by now convinced that it was
4
mathematical and geometrical, and that was when I started down the path to find the
evidence. It was going to be a difficult journey but first I had to know what was already
there, and not just in general terms, but specifically and accurately, and that was when I
found the first of the keys to the original Great Pyramid. It had come in the form of a very
large folder tied with ribbon inside which was a complete set of very large and accurate
architectural style drawings showing the detailed interior, the result of a post-war survey
undertaken by Italian engineers.
The survey would soon be forming the basis and
verification for every discovery made.
The next key was in the discovery of the unit of measure that had been used by the
pyramid builders. The survey was done in metres, and a conversion was needed because
the French metre did not exist at the time when the pyramid was built. The unit had to
convert from metres to feet, and then from feet to the unit used. Many books have already
been written on the subject of the pyramid units, with all manner of different kinds of units
considered, but the answer was in fact very simple when the right assumptions were made.
That had made it possible to know the original distances that had applied at the pyramid
when it was first built and the resulting dimensions were revelations indeed.
Then the third and most important key was the discovery that the planners had not
measured angles in degrees but in number form. If that is accepted, then distances in the
correct unit could be found from angles inside a pyramid triangle, and once that was
accepted, then the pyramid distances themselves were revealed. It was extraordinary. It
gave me the feeling that I was actually looking into minds of those who lived many
thousands of years ago, and I was seeing these things with their eyes, and knowing them
after eons of time had come and gone. It was a humbling experience. I could see the
meaning in the numbers, and in the way the geometry was working out with a fabulous
logic of its own as I found one thing after another. These were people who knew what they
were talking about. Many questions could now be answered, including the reasons why the
chambers and corridors were built in the manner they were, and in the places they were.
That was why the pyramid was called great.
Why were there two chambers rather than just one? Why was the lower chamber located
on the pyramid centerline whereas the upper chamber was placed offset to the south of
centre? It was mathematical. Why were there four shafts when no other pyramid of the
Nile Valley carried any shafts at all, and what in anycase were they doing there? They
were geometrical guidelines. Were the Egyptologists and archaeologists correct when they
5
maintained that the Great Pyramid was not designed at all, except on a very casual basis?
No, they were not correct and the specifics will show why.
Were they right when they
claimed that the unknown builders had changed their minds about the location of the lower
chamber as the pyramid progressed upwards?
They were wrong because vandals had
demolished the original floor in order to hide the evidence on the floor level, another
number. Did the upper chamber have a geometrical purpose? It had a clear geometrical
purpose and when I found out what it was it was intrigueuing, to say the least. The fact of
two chambers in one pyramid was no accident.
This account will show by the means of large numbers of computer generated drawings
how the Great Pyramid was first planned, how the geometry was based on triangles,
squares and double squares, and how these figures were harmoniously coordinated into a
fantastic whole to make sense of everything that exists and had once existed. The Great
Pyramid was unlike any of the others except that it looks like a pyramid and was built of
stone. It was a gigantic engine of numbers and angles, and it was designed in honour of
the gods and to dimensions that would harmonise with their relatively unpublicized, but
ancient numbers of identity. Everything was built to a specific geometrical purpose and
the secrets were hidden in the reasons why the original pyramid was a certain height, and
sloped at a certain angle.
The modern survey and the two main keys had found the
mathematical Great Pyramid and this account will show how it was created for the first
time. The pyramid was indeed great.

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika:

Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin